• (833) 824-5350
  • Make A Payment
  • Search
Schwartz Law.
  • About
    • Our Team
    • News & Events
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Business Insurance
    • General Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Professional Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Directors and Officers Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Insurance Fraud Claims & Litigation
    • Bad Faith Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Employment Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Cyber Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Healthcare Provider Third-Party Reimbursement Claims & Lawsuits
    • Federal Civil Rico Insurance Litigation
  • Healthcare Fraud
    • Federal Civil Rico Lawsuits
    • White Collar Criminal Defense (State and Federal)
    • Grand Jury Subpoenas
    • Government Investigations
    • OPMC Investigations
    • OPD Investigations
  • Individual Insurance
    • Long Term Disability Insurance Claims
    • Life Insurance Claims & Lawsuits
    • Long-Term Care Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Health Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Property Loss Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Bad Faith Insurance Lawsuits
    • Insurance Fraud Claims and Lawsuits
    • General Liability Claims and Lawsuits
    • ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act)
    • Denial of Insurance Claim
  • Business Disputes
    • Breach of Contract Lawsuits
    • Business Disputes Alleging Fraud
    • Partnership & Shareholder Disputes
    • Business Disputes Alleging Unfair Competition
    • Business Disputes Alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Real Estate Claims & Lawsuits
    • General Business & Complex Claims and Litigation
    • Franchise Litigation
    • Business Torts
    • Injunctions
  • Real Estate
    • Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Insights
    • Blogs
    • Video Blogs
    • Podcasts
  • Contact

CASE STUDIES

Home > Insights > ​Schwartz, Conroy & Hack forces insurance company to reverse LTD claim denial and pay full benefits

​Schwartz, Conroy & Hack forces insurance company to reverse LTD claim denial and pay full benefits

​Schwartz, Conroy & Hack forces insurance company to reverse LTD claim denial and pay full benefits cover

Michail Hack, Partner; Stephen Broer, Of Counsel; and Christine Kingsley, Claims Paralegal

The Challenge

A medical professional suffering from multiple disabling conditions could no longer perform the duties of their profession and filed a claim with their long-term disability (LTD) insurance provider, UNUM. The professional had a special policy that provided benefits if they were unable to perform the material duties of their specific occupation (known as “own occupation” coverage) from the date of disability until retirement age. As this is a much longer period than more common policies, which typically limit the own occupation period to just two years, the insurance company had a significant financial incentive to avoid coverage. The insurer denied the policyholder’s claim for benefits in 2024.

The Solution

Following the denial, the medical professional came to Schwartz, Conroy & Hack. Understanding the insurance company’s financial incentive to deny coverage, we developed a comprehensive strategy to best position the claim for approval. This was particularly challenging since our client suffered from many co-morbid conditions and treated with multiple healthcare providers for the various disabling conditions.

The claim was governed by ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974). Insurance companies handling ERISA-governed claims are under tight deadlines. For this reason, UNUM sought to limit the amount of time that our client had to present all supporting evidence.

However, claimants are not bound by ERISA’s time constraints. They can unilaterally extend the appeal period to accommodate additional documents, information and statements from treating healthcare providers to support their appeal. Knowing this, we forced UNUM to recognize that it could not unilaterally limit the timeframe for our client to present all relevant evidence. We also reminded UNUM that it had previously signed a multi-state settlement agreement whereby it agreed to give deference to treating healthcare providers. UNUM was forced to concede these points, and the appeal remained open until all supporting evidence could be properly filed.

The Result

Our tenacious team of Partner Michail Hack, Of Counsel Stephen Broer, and Claims Paralegal Christine Kingsley successfully worked to hold UNUM accountable to its obligations, and the insurer eventually agreed to honor the claim and pay our client’s full benefits. Schwartz, Conroy & Hack forced the insurance company to keep the promises it had made when our client had purchased the policy.

Contact Us

CONTACT US

CATEGORIES

  • Bad Faith Insurance Claims
  • Business Disputes
  • Business Insurance
  • Case Studies
  • ERISA
  • General Liability Insurance Claims
  • Healthcare Fraud
  • Individual Insurance
  • Insights
  • Long-Term Care Insurance Claims
  • Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims
  • News & Events
  • Podcast
  • Real Estate
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

CASE STUDY

​Schwartz, Conroy & Hack Secures Court of Appeals Victory Stopping Insurer Overreach in No-Fault

​Schwartz, Conroy & Hack Secures Court of Appeals Victory Stopping Insurer Overreach in No-Fault

Garden City
666 Old Country Road, Ninth Floor
Garden City, NY 11530

New York City
1185 Avenue of the Americas, Third Floor
New York, NY 10036

Toll Free: (833) 824-5350
Phone: (516) 745-1122
Fax: (516) 745-0844

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Copyright 2026 Schwartz, Conroy & Hack, PC

Terms Of Use & Privacy Policy

Contact Us

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow