• (833) 824-5350
  • Make A Payment
  • Search
Schwartz Law.
  • About
    • Our Team
    • News & Events
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Business Insurance
    • General Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Professional Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Directors and Officers Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Insurance Fraud Claims & Litigation
    • Bad Faith Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Employment Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Cyber Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Healthcare Provider Third-Party Reimbursement Claims & Lawsuits
    • Federal Civil Rico Insurance Litigation
  • Healthcare Fraud
    • Federal Civil Rico Lawsuits
    • White Collar Criminal Defense (State and Federal)
    • Grand Jury Subpoenas
    • Government Investigations
    • OPMC Investigations
    • OPD Investigations
  • Individual Insurance
    • Long Term Disability Insurance Claims
    • Life Insurance Claims & Lawsuits
    • Long-Term Care Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Health Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Property Loss Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Bad Faith Insurance Lawsuits
    • Insurance Fraud Claims and Lawsuits
    • General Liability Claims and Lawsuits
    • ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act)
    • Denial of Insurance Claim
  • Business Disputes
    • Breach of Contract Lawsuits
    • Business Disputes Alleging Fraud
    • Partnership & Shareholder Disputes
    • Business Disputes Alleging Unfair Competition
    • Business Disputes Alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Real Estate Claims & Lawsuits
    • General Business & Complex Claims and Litigation
    • Franchise Litigation
    • Business Torts
    • Injunctions
  • Real Estate
    • Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Insights
    • Blogs
    • Video Blogs
    • Podcasts
  • Contact

Blog

Home > Insights > Mishandling of settlement demand costs plaintiffs more than $5 million in bad faith money

Mishandling of settlement demand costs plaintiffs more than $5 million in bad faith money

The Georgia Supreme Court recently dismissed a $5.3 million bad faith claim against First Acceptance Insurance Company because plaintiffs’ counsel failed to put a time restriction in its settlement demand letter.

In the case, several claimants in a multi-car accident were severely injured by a driver, who died in the accident. The driver was insured by First Acceptance. Two of the claimants demanded the insurance policy limits of $50,000 — $25,000 for each claimant. The demand letter did not contain a time limit for First Acceptance to accept or reject the demand.  Forty-one days after the demand letter had been sent, the claimants revoked the offer and filed suit.

Over half a year later, First Acceptance offered the claimants $25,000 each. The claimants rejected the offer. At trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the claimants for approximately $5.3 million. After the verdict, the estate for the deceased driver brought a suit against First Acceptance for bad faith failure to settle the claims within the policy’s limits. The trial court dismissed the bad faith claim on summary judgment, but the appeals court reversed. The Georgia Supreme Court reversed again and granted summary judgment in favor of First Acceptance, dismissing the bad faith complaint.


In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that First Acceptance believed that the lack of a time restriction in the demand letter created an open-ended offer to settle. Had the plaintiffs stated that the insurer had a time limit within which to accept the offer, and then had revoked it, the bad faith claim would have been viable.


This case was a $5.3 million teachable moment on how to properly posture a settlement demand in Georgia in order to trigger a potential claim for bad faith refusal to settle.


This case also serves as a reminder that each state law concerning legal issues like bad faith can be—and often are—very different. In New York, for example, time-restricted, bad faith demand letters are typically unenforceable unless they give the insurance company adequate time to investigate and appreciate the risk and exposure to their insureds.  

If you have any questions concerning a bad faith case, or any other questions about insurance coverage, please contact us.

 

Evan-Schwartz

Evan S. Schwartz
Founder of Schwartz, Conroy & Hack
833-824-5350
[email protected]

Contact Us

CONTACT US

CATEGORIES

  • Bad Faith Insurance Claims
  • Business Disputes
  • Business Insurance
  • Case Studies
  • ERISA
  • General Liability Insurance Claims
  • Healthcare Fraud
  • Individual Insurance
  • Insights
  • Long-Term Care Insurance Claims
  • Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims
  • News & Events
  • Podcast
  • Real Estate
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

CASE STUDY

Schwartz, Conroy & Hack Presents Overwhelming Evidence to Force Insurer to Pay Financier’s LTD Claim

Schwartz, Conroy & Hack Presents Overwhelming Evidence to Force Insurer to Pay Financier’s LTD Claim

Garden City
666 Old Country Road, Ninth Floor
Garden City, NY 11530

New York City
1185 Avenue of the Americas, Third Floor
New York, NY 10036

Toll Free: (833) 824-5350
Phone: (516) 745-1122
Fax: (516) 745-0844

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Copyright 2025 Schwartz, Conroy & Hack, PC

Terms Of Use & Privacy Policy

Contact Us

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow