• (833) 824-5350
  • Make A Payment
  • Search
Schwartz Law.
  • About
    • Our Team
    • News & Events
    • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Business Insurance
    • General Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Professional Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Directors and Officers Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Insurance Fraud Claims & Litigation
    • Bad Faith Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Employment Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Cyber Liability Insurance Claims & Litigation
    • Healthcare Provider Third-Party Reimbursement Claims & Lawsuits
    • Federal Civil Rico Insurance Litigation
  • Healthcare Fraud
    • Federal Civil Rico Lawsuits
    • White Collar Criminal Defense (State and Federal)
    • Grand Jury Subpoenas
    • Government Investigations
    • OPMC Investigations
    • OPD Investigations
  • Individual Insurance
    • Long Term Disability Insurance Claims
    • Life Insurance Claims & Lawsuits
    • Long-Term Care Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Health Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Property Loss Insurance Claims and Lawsuits
    • Bad Faith Insurance Lawsuits
    • Insurance Fraud Claims and Lawsuits
    • General Liability Claims and Lawsuits
    • ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act)
    • Denial of Insurance Claim
  • Business Disputes
    • Breach of Contract Lawsuits
    • Business Disputes Alleging Fraud
    • Partnership & Shareholder Disputes
    • Business Disputes Alleging Unfair Competition
    • Business Disputes Alleging Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Real Estate Claims & Lawsuits
    • General Business & Complex Claims and Litigation
    • Franchise Litigation
    • Business Torts
    • Injunctions
  • Real Estate
    • Commercial Transactions
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Insights
    • Blogs
    • Video Blogs
    • Podcasts
  • Contact

Blog

Home > Insights > The Water Damage Exclusion and Your Commercial Property Insurance

The Water Damage Exclusion and Your Commercial Property Insurance

Water Damage

An all-risk commercial property insurance policy does not, in fact, cover all risks. Every property insurance policy has exclusions, and one of the most common – and most often disputed – is the water damage exclusion. 

What is a water damage exclusion clause?

A water damage exclusion clause bars coverage for certain types of water-related claims. Generally, most policies exclude damage caused by flooding from storms, tsunamis, standing water, groundwater, or sewage backups. In many policies, the exclusions are ambiguously worded. This is something insurance companies do intentionally in an attempt to limit their liability. The water damage exclusion is no exception. When water exclusion provisions are vaguely worded, courts have generally interpreted them to apply to damage caused by naturally occurring water phenomena but not manmade water events.

Natural vs. manmade causes

In many disputes, the water damage at issue resulted from a combination of natural and manmade factors. In South Carolina, a significant rainfall overwhelmed an incomplete underground stormwater drainage system that the state was constructing and caused a nearby hotel to suffer damage from flooding. The insurance company denied the hotel’s claim, citing its water damage exclusion, which was worded as “damage resulting from flood, surface water, waves, tides, tidal waves, overflow of any body of water, or their spray, all whether driven by wind or not.” The court held that the rainwater collected and channeled in the stormwater collection system, which ultimately caused the property damage, did not qualify as “flood water” or “surface water” under the exclusion.”1 Therefore, the insured was entitled to coverage.

Similarly, a Colorado court found the water exclusion did not apply to water damage to a home located near the base of a mountain. The home was flooded by water that originated from the natural runoff of melted snow, but the water was diverted by manmade trenches. “The runoff lost its character as surface water when it was diverted by the trenches and therefore was not within the surface water exclusion” contained in the policy, the court held.2 A home in Arkansas was flooded after a water main break. The court sided with the homeowners, finding that the terms “flood” and “surface water” in the policy’s exclusion did not include water from a burst water main.3

However, some courts have interpreted the exclusion more broadly. In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, the Fifth Circuit made no distinction between natural and manmade causes and sided with insurers in cases against commercial and residential property owners that involved damage from flooding of breached levees. The policies contained a “specific provision expressly excluding damage caused by flood, and none of the exclusions indicates that whether a particular flood is excluded depends on whether its cause is purely natural.” Noting that its finding was consistent with Louisiana law, the court stated, “If the policy wording at issue is clear and unambiguously expresses the parties’ intent, the insurance contract must be enforced as written.”4

The effects of moving water

In a case involving a partial building collapse, the Fifth Circuit sided with the insured in adopting a limitation on the water damage exclusion. The building’s foundation had given way under heavy rains, causing the collapse. The court held that water damage generally refers to “staining, rusting, or other incidents of the chemical presence of water and not to the strictly kinetic effects of moving water.”5 Therefore, the collapse was not subject to the water damage exclusion. Conversely, in a case brought by a homeowner, a court in Pennsylvania held that cracks in the home’s foundation caused by water runoff were, in fact, subject to the water damage exclusion.6

If you are involved in a dispute with your business insurance company, contact us. We have the expertise, experience and tenacity to make insurance companies keep their promises to you and your business. 

1 M and M Corp. of South Carolina v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 390 S.C. 255, 701 S.E.2d 33 (S.C. 2010)

2 Heller v. Fire Ins. Exch., 800 P.2d 1006, 1009 (Colo. 1990)

3 Ebbing v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 67 Ark. App. 381, 386-87, 1 S.W.3d 459, 462 (1999)

4 In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litig., 495 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2007)

5 Peach State Uniform Service, Inc. v. American Insurance Co., 507 F.2d 996, 999 (5th Cir. 1975)

6 McArdle v. Hartford Insurance Co. of the Midwest, No. 99-4273 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2000)

Contact Us

CONTACT US

CATEGORIES

  • Bad Faith Insurance Claims
  • Business Disputes
  • Business Insurance
  • Case Studies
  • ERISA
  • Healthcare Fraud
  • Individual Insurance
  • Insights
  • Long-Term Care Insurance Claims
  • Long-Term Disability Insurance Claims
  • News & Events
  • Podcast
  • Real Estate
  • Uncategorized
  • Video

CASE STUDY

Customizing our Claim Submission Services to Help a Client Secure Long-Term Disability Insurance Benefits

Customizing our Claim Submission Services to Help a Client Secure Long-Term Disability Insurance Benefits

Garden City
666 Old Country Road, Ninth Floor
Garden City, NY 11530

New York City
1185 Avenue of the Americas, Third Floor
New York, NY 10036

Toll Free: (833) 824-5350
Phone: (516) 745-1122
Fax: (516) 745-0844

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Copyright 2025 Schwartz, Conroy & Hack, PC

Terms Of Use & Privacy Policy

Contact Us

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow